Approximately 62% of patients were immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV)-unmutated, and 18% of patients tested positive for TP53 aberrations.
After a median follow-up of 53 months, 85 patients remained on treatment. A total of 14 patients had discontinued therapy, most commonly because of adverse events (AEs; n=6) and second primary cancers (n=4).
All patients eventually transitioned to twice-daily acalabrutinib 100 mg following observed improvements in trough BTK occupancy with twice-daily dosing. The median BTK occupancy of 97% to 99% was found during twice-daily dosing at steady-state on days eight and 28 at trough. This was considered better than that observed using 200 mg once-daily dosing (100 mg twice daily vs. 200 mg once daily: trough day eight [p=0.0034] and day 28 [p=0.0003]).
The overall response rate to acalabrutinib was 97%, which included a partial response rate of 90% and a complete response rate of 7%. At four years, the estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 96% and 90%, respectively. While median duration of response (DOR) was not reached during the study, the estimated 48-month DOR was 97%.
In patients with del17p and/or mutated TP53 (n=12), the estimated 48-month PFS was 82% and the estimated 48-month EFS was 75%. Among patients with complex karyotype (n=12), the respective estimated 48-month PFS and EFS rates were 91% and 83%.
Up to 38% of patients experienced a serious AE. Events that necessitated treatment discontinuation in 6% of patients included second primary cancers (n=4) and infection (n=2). Grade ≥3 AEs of special interest included infection (15%), hypertension (11%), bleeding events (3%), and atrial fibrillation (2%).
Two patients died during the study. One death was a result of multiple organ dysfunction in the context of pneumonia and grade 4 sepsis. The other patient experienced cardiac failure during an ongoing lung infection and atrial fibrillation.
This trial is limited by its inclusion of patients predominantly treated at academic centers in the U.S., which may limit the generalizability of the results across larger patient groups treated in other health care systems.
Study authors report relationships with Acerta Pharma, which sponsored this trial.